Sonia Sotomayor seems to have made it thru the Senate confirmation hearings without creating a major political issue for the Republicans or some misstep which would threaten her nomination. Life in American politics has changed when only some Republicans are willing to take on directly a pro-abortion, liberal judge. Clearly there has been a shift to the left and these hearings are more evidence of that.
Attorney Gordon Johnson
http://tbilaw.com
http://fishtail.tv
Date: 7/17/2009 10:41 AM
JESSE J. HOLLAND,Associated Press Writer
WASHINGTON (AP) — Supreme Court nominee Sonia Sotomayor won her first public pledge of support from a Republican senator Friday, after a smooth performance at her confirmation hearings that has placed her firmly on track to become the high court’s first Latina and the first Democratic-named justice in 15 years.
Sen. Richard Lugar, R-Ind., announced that he would vote for Sotomayor, calling her “clearly qualified to serve on the Supreme Court,” after four days of Judiciary Committee hearings in which he said she showed “a judicial temperament.” Lugar, who previously voted to confirm Sotomayor to her current spot on a federal appeals court, was just the first of what is expected to be a number of Republicans who back Sotomayor.
The only other Republicans to publicly weigh in on Sotomayor’s nomination are two of the Senate’s staunchest conservatives, Sens. James Inhofe of Oklahoma and Jim Bunning of Kentucky, who have said they intend to vote no on President Barack Obama’s first high court choice.
With Democrats solidly behind Sotomayor, three days of grueling questioning before the Senate Judiciary Committee gave Republicans no new ammunition to use against the 55-year-old nominee, who was raised in a South Bronx housing project, educated in the Ivy League, and rose through the legal ranks to spend 17 years on the federal bench.
Now GOP senators are weighing the tricky politics of voting on Sotomayor’s confirmation without alienating either their conservative base or Hispanic and women voters.
The GOP’s leader at the confirmation hearings, Sen. Jeff Sessions of Alabama has said he has no interest in stopping or even delaying Sotomayor’s confirmation vote as the country’s 111th Supreme Court justice.
“I look forward to you getting that vote before we recess” on in Aug. 7, said Sessions, despite calls from some conservatives to delay the vote until after the Senate returns in September from its summer break.
“Each senator will make up their own mind,” Sessions said.
Sotomayor has overwhelming if not unanimous support among the Senate’s 58 Democrats and two independents.
Democrats, sensing a big win, immediately scheduled a committee vote Tuesday, starting the clock on a schedule for a final confirmation vote before the Senate leaves in August for a four-week summer break as well as before the next Supreme Court argument on Sept. 9.
Republicans will likely ask for a weeklong delay before the panel vote, but a unified GOP front against her also seems unlikely, given the praise Sotomayor got from a couple of GOP critics on the Judiciary Committee.
“Your judicial record strikes me as pretty much in the mainstream of judicial decision-making,” said Sen. John Cornyn, R-Texas. Added Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C.: “You have, as a judge, been generally in the mainstream.”
The underlying politics are dicey for Republicans. They must be careful to keep faith with constituents like National Rifle Association members who oppose her, yet avoid offending the Hispanic voters who represent the fastest-growing segment of the electorate.
Sotomayor’s hearings were as much a prelude for future Supreme Court fights as a battle over the judge herself. Republicans criticized Obama’s assertion — made before nominating Sotomayor — that he was looking for a justice with “the quality of empathy,” and earlier an statement when he was a senator that some decisions depend on what’s in a judge’s heart.
They also pressed Sotomayor repeatedly on her 2001 statement that she hoped a “wise Latina” would usually rule better than a white male, drawing expressions of regret from the nominee, who said her words were poorly chosen.
Sotomayor parried all their questions on hot-button issues like guns and abortion rights and defended her speeches that have been faulted as showing bias.
She was unequivocal, however, in her statements on what kind of justice she would be. “I do not permit my sympathies, personal views or prejudices to influence the outcome of my cases,” she told senators.
Republicans, expressing concern that she would bring bias to the court, gave a speaking role at the hearing to Frank Ricci, a white New Haven, Conn., firefighter whose reverse discrimination claim was rejected by Sotomayor and two other appeals court judges. He complained that the ruling showed a belief “that citizens should be reduced to racial statistics” but declined when given the chance to say Sotomayor’s nomination should be rejected.
Her panel’s ruling was overturned last month by the Supreme Court she hopes to join.
___
On the Net:
Senate Judiciary Committee: http://judiciary.senate.gov
Copyright 2009 The Associated Press.
HHS candidate best known for health care cuts
Date: 2/10/2009
By KEVIN FREKING and ERIK SCHELZIG
Associated Press Writers
WASHINGTON (AP) — Few governors know the pitfalls of soaring health costs better than Tennessee Gov. Phil Bredesen, which helps explain why President Barack Obama is reportedly considering the Democrat for health secretary.
In 2005, Bredesen cut 170,000 adults from Tennessee’s Medicaid program, called TennCare. He reduced benefits for thousands more.
Critics describe Bredesen’s actions as the biggest cuts in public health insurance in the nation’s history. They believe he’s the wrong person to lead an effort to expand health insurance coverage, and they’re throwing support behind other candidates, including Kansas Gov. Kathleen Sebelius, widely viewed as near the top of Obama’s list of candidates to run the Health and Human Services Department.
However, some say Bredesen’s stand shows he’s willing to tackle the toughest of problems.
Before the cuts were made, TennCare’s growth rate was making it harder to pay for education, roads and other critical services. Tennessee led the nation in the percentage of its population on Medicaid and the percentage of its budget going to Medicaid. However, on a per-person basis, Tennessee ranked 48th in state and local tax collections.
Dennis Smith, now a senior fellow at the Heritage Foundation, was in charge of Medicaid at the federal level in 2005. He said Bredesen’s actions were “necessary and appropriate” because the program was out of control.
For example, almost every state has some type of system that allows it to approve the amount and types of prescription drugs that beneficiaries get. Tennessee didn’t have such controls. Eligibility rules were also much broader than those of other states, allowing for enrollment of adults who would not have been eligible for Medicaid elsewhere.
The most praise for Bredesen comes from conservatives. Obama has shown a willingness to consider their views in his appointments so far, while many of those on the left of the issue say Bredesen is the wrong choice.
Bredesen emphasized in an interview Tuesday that he hasn’t applied for the HHS job or campaigned for it. But he has launched a counterattack against health care advocates for what he calls a distortion of the events that led to the TennCare cuts in 2005.
“Your name comes out and the next thing you know, people are dumping cans of garbage on you,” he said. “So I’m interested in, first of all, setting the record straight.”
Bredesen said the move to cut the number of TennCare enrollees came after advocates “absolutely pushed me to the brink” by blocking other proposals to rein in the costs of the program that was expected to grow by $680 million in just one year.
“Their mantra was, you can do anything you want, but you can’t reduce any benefits and you can’t remove any people,” he said. “They fought me every step of the way on ideological grounds, and basically pushed us to the point where we had no alternative to take some drastic action.”
The governor also downplayed the potential problem of having to work with groups who so vigorously opposed him. More important players will include pharmaceutical companies, hospital, doctors and medical equipment manufacturers, he said.
“What’s going to have to happen is not putting together a coalition of liberal advocacy groups for health care, but a coalition of real people who are sitting here on one-sixth of the U.S. economy and try to find some common ground,” he said.
In some respects, Bredesen sounds like former HHS Secretary Mike Leavitt when describing his philosophy for reforming health care.
“I certainly believe there’s an underlying right and the federal government ought to be financing a basic level of health care for everybody,” Bredesen said.
Bredesen’s emphasis is on the word basic. Leavitt repeatedly stressed the same emphasis. He listed as his top priority that “every American has access to basic health insurance at an affordable price.”
Bredesen met with Obama for the first time in his Washington office shortly after Obama announced he would seek the Democratic nomination for president in 2007.
Bredesen in 1980 founded a health maintenance organization called HealthAmerica Corp., which became the country’s second-largest HMO before he sold it in 1986 for about $400 million.
___
Associated Press writer Erik Schelzig reported from Nashville, Tenn.
Copyright 2009 The Associated Press.
By KEVIN FREKING and ERIK SCHELZIG
Associated Press Writers
WASHINGTON (AP) — Few governors know the pitfalls of soaring health costs better than Tennessee Gov. Phil Bredesen, which helps explain why President Barack Obama is reportedly considering the Democrat for health secretary.
In 2005, Bredesen cut 170,000 adults from Tennessee’s Medicaid program, called TennCare. He reduced benefits for thousands more.
Critics describe Bredesen’s actions as the biggest cuts in public health insurance in the nation’s history. They believe he’s the wrong person to lead an effort to expand health insurance coverage, and they’re throwing support behind other candidates, including Kansas Gov. Kathleen Sebelius, widely viewed as near the top of Obama’s list of candidates to run the Health and Human Services Department.
However, some say Bredesen’s stand shows he’s willing to tackle the toughest of problems.
Before the cuts were made, TennCare’s growth rate was making it harder to pay for education, roads and other critical services. Tennessee led the nation in the percentage of its population on Medicaid and the percentage of its budget going to Medicaid. However, on a per-person basis, Tennessee ranked 48th in state and local tax collections.
Dennis Smith, now a senior fellow at the Heritage Foundation, was in charge of Medicaid at the federal level in 2005. He said Bredesen’s actions were “necessary and appropriate” because the program was out of control.
For example, almost every state has some type of system that allows it to approve the amount and types of prescription drugs that beneficiaries get. Tennessee didn’t have such controls. Eligibility rules were also much broader than those of other states, allowing for enrollment of adults who would not have been eligible for Medicaid elsewhere.
The most praise for Bredesen comes from conservatives. Obama has shown a willingness to consider their views in his appointments so far, while many of those on the left of the issue say Bredesen is the wrong choice.
Bredesen emphasized in an interview Tuesday that he hasn’t applied for the HHS job or campaigned for it. But he has launched a counterattack against health care advocates for what he calls a distortion of the events that led to the TennCare cuts in 2005.
“Your name comes out and the next thing you know, people are dumping cans of garbage on you,” he said. “So I’m interested in, first of all, setting the record straight.”
Bredesen said the move to cut the number of TennCare enrollees came after advocates “absolutely pushed me to the brink” by blocking other proposals to rein in the costs of the program that was expected to grow by $680 million in just one year.
“Their mantra was, you can do anything you want, but you can’t reduce any benefits and you can’t remove any people,” he said. “They fought me every step of the way on ideological grounds, and basically pushed us to the point where we had no alternative to take some drastic action.”
The governor also downplayed the potential problem of having to work with groups who so vigorously opposed him. More important players will include pharmaceutical companies, hospital, doctors and medical equipment manufacturers, he said.
“What’s going to have to happen is not putting together a coalition of liberal advocacy groups for health care, but a coalition of real people who are sitting here on one-sixth of the U.S. economy and try to find some common ground,” he said.
In some respects, Bredesen sounds like former HHS Secretary Mike Leavitt when describing his philosophy for reforming health care.
“I certainly believe there’s an underlying right and the federal government ought to be financing a basic level of health care for everybody,” Bredesen said.
Bredesen’s emphasis is on the word basic. Leavitt repeatedly stressed the same emphasis. He listed as his top priority that “every American has access to basic health insurance at an affordable price.”
Bredesen met with Obama for the first time in his Washington office shortly after Obama announced he would seek the Democratic nomination for president in 2007.
Bredesen in 1980 founded a health maintenance organization called HealthAmerica Corp., which became the country’s second-largest HMO before he sold it in 1986 for about $400 million.
___
Associated Press writer Erik Schelzig reported from Nashville, Tenn.
Copyright 2009 The Associated Press.
CNN: Gupta approached about surgeon general post
Date: 1/7/2009
By LAURAN NEERGAARD
AP Medical Writer
WASHINGTON (AP) — President-elect Barack Obama’s reported choice for surgeon general, CNN medical correspondent Sanjay Gupta, could bring a dose of star power to a job that hasn’t had that much clout in decades.
Gupta doesn’t just play a doctor on TV, he’s a neurosurgeon who still scrubs in part-time in one of the nation’s toughest hospitals when he’s not on CNN assignments that have taken him from Hurricane Katrina to Iraq. He also has co-hosted a health “network” that beams feel-good advice on TVs in clinic waiting rooms around the country — one that has drawn some criticism for drug-company promotion.
The surgeon general doesn’t set health policy — but the office can be an effective bully pulpit, and a major report aimed at Congress just last month called for “a more prominent and powerful role for the surgeon general who … should be a strong advocate for the American people.”
Past surgeons general pushed the nation to fight tobacco and AIDS. Having such a well-known TV personality could give the post a reach not seen since the renowned C. Everett Koop, who served under President Ronald Reagan and helped make AIDS a public health issue rather than a moral one — in an era before the 24/7 news cycle.
With the celebrity behind Gupta’s medical credentials, “it’s like a name-brand immediately,” said Dr. Michael Johns, chancellor at Emory University in Atlanta, where Gupta, 39, is an assistant professor of neurosurgery.
“If chosen, Dr. Gupta’s communication skills and medical knowledge could be a boon to the new administration’s health system reform efforts,” noted Dr. Joseph Heyman, chairman of the American Medical Association’s board.
And in contrast to the grandfatherly Koop, People magazine named the then-single Gupta one of the sexiest men of 2003.
However, a surgeon general would “need to demonstrate skills that are too often missing in medical news on TV: skepticism about the science and a careful analysis of both the benefits and harms of medical care,” said Drs. Lisa Schwartz and Steven Woloshin of the Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice.
The pair raised questions about drug-company sponsorship of some programs Gupta hosted in a broader critique of medical media coverage last fall, and on Tuesday they urged careful examination of any potential conflicts of interest.
CNN said Obama had approached Gupta about the job but said he would not comment on the discussions.
“Since first learning that Dr. Gupta was under consideration for the surgeon general position, CNN has made sure that his on-air reporting has been on health and wellness matters and not on health care policy or any matters involving the new administration,” the cable network said Tuesday.
Two Democrats with knowledge of the discussions over the surgeon general spot said Gupta was under consideration but cautioned a choice has not been made. They spoke on condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to speak to the media on the matter.
Obama’s transition office did not immediately respond to requests for comment.
Gupta has made a handful of political donations in recent years, but appears to have stayed out of the 2008 presidential race.
To take the job, he’d have to give up a lucrative media-and-medical empire. Gupta hosts “House Call” on CNN, contributes reports to CBS News, and writes a column for Time magazine, as well as operating and overseeing residents part-time at Atlanta’s Grady Memorial Hospital, known for its trauma cases.
During the Clinton administration, Gupta was a White House fellow and special adviser to then-first lady Hillary Rodham Clinton.
Gupta grew up in the Detroit area, the son of parents who moved from India in the 1960s to work at a Ford plant. He earned undergraduate and medical degrees from the University of Michigan.
CBS News is a unit of CBS Corp.; CNN is owned by Time Warner Inc.
___
On the Net:
Obama transition: http://www.change.gov
Copyright 2009 The Associated Press.
By LAURAN NEERGAARD
AP Medical Writer
WASHINGTON (AP) — President-elect Barack Obama’s reported choice for surgeon general, CNN medical correspondent Sanjay Gupta, could bring a dose of star power to a job that hasn’t had that much clout in decades.
Gupta doesn’t just play a doctor on TV, he’s a neurosurgeon who still scrubs in part-time in one of the nation’s toughest hospitals when he’s not on CNN assignments that have taken him from Hurricane Katrina to Iraq. He also has co-hosted a health “network” that beams feel-good advice on TVs in clinic waiting rooms around the country — one that has drawn some criticism for drug-company promotion.
The surgeon general doesn’t set health policy — but the office can be an effective bully pulpit, and a major report aimed at Congress just last month called for “a more prominent and powerful role for the surgeon general who … should be a strong advocate for the American people.”
Past surgeons general pushed the nation to fight tobacco and AIDS. Having such a well-known TV personality could give the post a reach not seen since the renowned C. Everett Koop, who served under President Ronald Reagan and helped make AIDS a public health issue rather than a moral one — in an era before the 24/7 news cycle.
With the celebrity behind Gupta’s medical credentials, “it’s like a name-brand immediately,” said Dr. Michael Johns, chancellor at Emory University in Atlanta, where Gupta, 39, is an assistant professor of neurosurgery.
“If chosen, Dr. Gupta’s communication skills and medical knowledge could be a boon to the new administration’s health system reform efforts,” noted Dr. Joseph Heyman, chairman of the American Medical Association’s board.
And in contrast to the grandfatherly Koop, People magazine named the then-single Gupta one of the sexiest men of 2003.
However, a surgeon general would “need to demonstrate skills that are too often missing in medical news on TV: skepticism about the science and a careful analysis of both the benefits and harms of medical care,” said Drs. Lisa Schwartz and Steven Woloshin of the Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice.
The pair raised questions about drug-company sponsorship of some programs Gupta hosted in a broader critique of medical media coverage last fall, and on Tuesday they urged careful examination of any potential conflicts of interest.
CNN said Obama had approached Gupta about the job but said he would not comment on the discussions.
“Since first learning that Dr. Gupta was under consideration for the surgeon general position, CNN has made sure that his on-air reporting has been on health and wellness matters and not on health care policy or any matters involving the new administration,” the cable network said Tuesday.
Two Democrats with knowledge of the discussions over the surgeon general spot said Gupta was under consideration but cautioned a choice has not been made. They spoke on condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to speak to the media on the matter.
Obama’s transition office did not immediately respond to requests for comment.
Gupta has made a handful of political donations in recent years, but appears to have stayed out of the 2008 presidential race.
To take the job, he’d have to give up a lucrative media-and-medical empire. Gupta hosts “House Call” on CNN, contributes reports to CBS News, and writes a column for Time magazine, as well as operating and overseeing residents part-time at Atlanta’s Grady Memorial Hospital, known for its trauma cases.
During the Clinton administration, Gupta was a White House fellow and special adviser to then-first lady Hillary Rodham Clinton.
Gupta grew up in the Detroit area, the son of parents who moved from India in the 1960s to work at a Ford plant. He earned undergraduate and medical degrees from the University of Michigan.
CBS News is a unit of CBS Corp.; CNN is owned by Time Warner Inc.
___
On the Net:
Obama transition: http://www.change.gov
Copyright 2009 The Associated Press.