Columbia University Stops Brain Research Over Tainted Injections

0 comments

Posted on 20th July 2010 by gjohnson in Uncategorized

, , , , , , ,

It’s a pretty shocking situation. Respected Columbia University shut down research at its brain-imaging center after federal investigators discovered that the nationally renowned facility had given patients drugs with dangerous impurities. 

The New York Times did a Page One story Saturday on the Food and Drug Administration’s investigation of Columbia’s Kreitchman PET Center, which is on West 168th Street in Manhattan. This center over the years has received millions of dollars from the federal government and drug companies to conduct research on the effects of drugs and brain disorders.   

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/07/17/health/17columbia.html?_r=1&scp=1&sq=FDA%20and%20Columbia%20University%20&st=cse

The center, according to The Times, is regarded as the leader in the use of positron emission tomography, or PET, for psychiatric research. 

 In a nutshell, the FDA found that the radiotracers used in PET, which the center has been producing for its own use, had impurity levels above and beyond what the agency permits.   

During exams radiotracers are injected into patients. The radiotracers build up in the parts of the body that are being studied — in the brain for psychiatric research – and release low-level radiation that researchers can detect. 

The FDA has standards for the radiation levels the purity and purity levels of radiotracers, but the ones that Columbia’s center was injecting into patients didn’t meet those standards.

And the purity levels of radiotracers are particularly important and sensitive in psychiatric research, because the drug can remain active in the brain and change a patient’s moods and behavior. That’s a particularly risky proposition when you’re dealing with people with depression and mental illness.

 The FDA has conducted several investigations of the Kreitchman Center, and repeatedly found that the facility was in violation of federal guidelines over a four-year span, according to The Times. In its most recent probe, which was in January, the FDA cited the center for six types of violations.

 In that investigation, the FDA said that since 2007 at least 10 batches of drugs with high levels of impurities that permitted had been injected into human subjects, The Times said. And in at least four cases, the impurity levels were twice what are permitted.

In the face of  those citations regarding its PET center, Columbia halted research as the facility.

Why would a respected research center inject their subjects with impure drugs? Ex-workers at the center explained that the lab “was under such pressure to produce studies that it papered over and hid impurities in drugs to stretch its resources and went ahead with business as usual despite FDA warnings,” The Times reported.

Columbia conducted its own  audit of its PET center, and decided that the FDA charges had enough substance to warrant an internal investigation. And the university added that so far, it hasn’t found any evidende that patients were harmed.


Attorney Gordon Johnson
Chair Traumatic Brain Injury Litigation Group, American Association of Justice
g@gordonjohnson.com :: 800-992-9447 :: Attorney Gordon S. Johnson, Jr.

http://subtlebraininjury.com :: http://brainanatomyguide.com :: http://car-accident-rain.com :: http://tbilaw.com
http://waiting.com :: http://vestibulardisorder.com :: http://youtube.com/profile?user=braininjuryattorney

New NFL Concussion Doctors Sacked By Congressional Committee

0 comments

Posted on 25th May 2010 by gjohnson in Uncategorized

, ,

By all the press accounts, it looks like the new co-chairmen of the NFL’s committee on head injuries fumbled their first appearance at a Congressional hearing on football and concussions Monday. 

One would have thought that Dr. Richard Ellenbogen and Dr. Hunt Batjer would have been fully prepared for a grilling by the House Judiciary Committee at the forum in Manhattan. Instead, they were skewered by both Congressmen Linda Sanchez, D-Calif., and Anthony Weiner, D-N.Y. 

Sanchez accused the two co-chairmen of sounding “like the same old NFL,” according to The New York Times Tuesday. And that remark wasn’t meant as a compliment.  

 http://www.nytimes.com/2010/05/25/sports/football/25concussion.html?ref=sports

 And Weiner was obviously annoyed when he threw out a question to the panel that was testifying, asking if someone could talk about helmet technology. But no one, not even Ellenbogen or Batjer, volunteered a word. Needless to say, that didn’t go over big with Weiner.

Ellenbogen and Batjer are meant to represent the NFL’s fresh start, and newly aggressive tack, in terms of dealing with player concussions. In March they replaced Dr. Ira Casson and Dr. David Viano on what the NFL is now calling its Head, Neck and Spine Committee. 

Casson and Viano stepped down from the committee last November, just a month after congressional hearings blasted the alleged inaccuracy  of research that the league had commissioned, as well as the NFL’s overall concussion policy.

At Monday’s hearing, according to the Associated Press, Weiner was not happy to learn that Casson and Viano were still involved in league research on helmets.

“Two so discredited people were part of these studies,” Weiner said,  his voice rising, said AP. “You have years of an infected system that needs to be cleaned up. The idea is to prevent injuries in the first place and there is a blind spot if you are not involved with helmets.” http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5jKImpZ7t9A0jLJ6fQdP5cH2GRM2gD9FTFI981

 During his testimony, Ellenbogen noted that NFL Commissoner Roger Goodell last week sent letters to 44 governors askng them to pass bills based on Washington State’s so-called Lystedt laws in their states. The concussion-protection law is named after a high school football player who went back to the field after sustaining a concussion, and then developed life-threatening problems.

During Monday’s session Sánchez remained concerned about retired players, with studies finding that they are  reporting dementia and other cognitive disease at a greater rate than the national population. She didn’t understand why the NFL’s concussion committee member could use data collected by Casson that others had  discredited

 Ellenbogen maintained that the league is committed to studying the cognitive woes of retired players and has a new NFL injury database.

As The Times noted, Monday’s testimony by Tammy Plevretes seemed to have a strong impact on Weiner. Plevretes’s son  Preston was badly injured while playing football for La Salle University in 2005. The Plevretes family alleged that the school didn’t have a proper policy for dealing with concussions, and the family eventually settled a lawsuit against La Salle last fall for $7.5 million, according to The Times.

Preston, who was in the audience during Monday’s hearing, suffered permanent brain injuries and now can barely talk  or walk.

“This is not a broken arm or a broken leg,” The Times quoted Tammy Plevretes, in tears, saying at the hearing. “This is a broken life.”

 


Attorney Gordon Johnson
Chair Traumatic Brain Injury Litigation Group, American Association of Justice
g@gordonjohnson.com :: 800-992-9447 :: Attorney Gordon S. Johnson, Jr.

http://subtlebraininjury.com :: http://brainanatomyguide.com :: http://car-accident-rain.com :: http://tbilaw.com
http://waiting.com :: http://vestibulardisorder.com :: http://youtube.com/profile?user=braininjuryattorney

New NFL Rules to Prevent Concussion

3 comments

Posted on 25th March 2010 by gjohnson in Brain injury | Concussion | NFL and concussion | brain injury attorney

, , , , ,

During their meeting in Orlando this week, and following much embarrassing publicity last year, National Football League officials made some key changes in their safety rules. http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/2010/03/25/sports/AP-FBN-NFL-Meetings.html?_r=1 Some of the rules passed Wednesday are aimed at protecting “defenseless” players, as the Associated Press described them, such as ball carriers who lose their helmets during action on the field. One of the changes is that a “defenseless” player can’t be struck in the neck or head area by a rival who uses his shoulder, helmet or forearm to make contact, according to AP. Before, such tackles were prohibited against receivers who couldn’t protect themselves, but now they apply to and protect all players. The rules changes made by the NFL also include one that mirrors college safety measures. Now in the NFL, if a player running with the football loses his helmet, the game will immediately be stopped, with the ball set at the spot where the helmet came off. Even umpires are getting more protection under the new rules. Umpires will now be placed behind the offensive backfield, not the linebackers’ area. That change was made because NFL officials had seen “a hundred” examples of umpires being runover. The National Hockey League also came closer to making more stringent safety rules, in terms of head injuries. It appears likely that hockey officials will impose punishments for blind-side checks to the head effective immediately, not at the start of next season, according to The New York Times Thursday. http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/2010/03/25/sports/AP-FBN-NFL-Meetings.html?_r=1


Attorney Gordon Johnson
Chair Traumatic Brain Injury Litigation Group, American Association of Justice
g@gordonjohnson.com :: 800-992-9447 :: Attorney Gordon S. Johnson, Jr.

http://subtlebraininjury.com :: http://brainanatomyguide.com :: http://car-accident-rain.com :: http://tbilaw.com
http://waiting.com :: http://vestibulardisorder.com :: http://youtube.com/profile?user=braininjuryattorney

Missouri May Pass Student Concussion Law

0 comments

Posted on 19th March 2010 by gjohnson in Brain injury | Concussion | NFL and concussion | brain injury attorney

, , , , , ,

Missouri is the latest state to be weighing legislation that would keep young athletes off the field if they appear to have sustained a concussion.

http://www.stltoday.com/stltoday/lifestyle/stories.nsf/healthfitness/story/EB4F233FBE11B772862576E9006F382D?OpenDocument

The proposed law mandates that athletes can only return to play after they are examined by a licensed medical professional and then give written permission to come back.

The concussion bill before the Missouri House is being sponsored by Rep. Don Calloway, although some of his fellow lawmakers don’t think his proposal goes far enough.

Rep. James Morris told the St. Louis Post-Dispatch that he wants the final law to be stricter. He is especially concerned about the issue because Morris witnessed his own son being knocked unconscious during a football practice. Morris insisted that his son be taken to the hospital.

More than 20 states are considering legislation to set stricter rules to bench athletes when they sustain head injuries. Several of those bills, including Missouri’s, are similar to a Washington law that was passed after Zachary Lystedt, 13, sustained traumatic brain injury at a junior high school game.

Missouri’s high school athletic organization is also preparing to take steps regarding head injuries, by instituting new rules regarding concussions.

According to the Dispatch, high school athletes who have symptoms of concussions will not be allowed to return to play the same day they are hurt, even if they don’t lose consciousness.


Attorney Gordon Johnson
Chair Traumatic Brain Injury Litigation Group, American Association of Justice
g@gordonjohnson.com :: 800-992-9447 :: Attorney Gordon S. Johnson, Jr.

http://subtlebraininjury.com :: http://brainanatomyguide.com :: http://car-accident-rain.com :: http://tbilaw.com
http://waiting.com :: http://vestibulardisorder.com :: http://youtube.com/profile?user=braininjuryattorney

Insightful Profile On Brain Collector Chris Nowinski

0 comments

Posted on 11th March 2010 by gjohnson in Uncategorized

, , , , , , ,

Business Week/Bloomberg has done a fascinating story on a man with a quest: Chris Nowinski, a researcher who is creating what he calls the first U.S. brain bank dedicated to the study of head trauma. http://www.businessweek.com/news/2010-03-10/nfl-brain-collector-shows-violence-in-slices-of-gray-matter.html

Nowinski, co-founder of the Boston University School of Medicine Center for the Study of Traumatic Encephalopathy, is collecting the brains of athletes. He is gathering physical proof for his belief that permanent brain damage is pervasive among athletes who suffer concussions.

So Nowinksi has taken on what some might consider the unenviable task of calling up the survivors of athletes who have died within 48 hours of their deaths to request their brains. He also solicits athletes who are now alive, getting them to agreed to donate their brains to his research. So far 270 have signed up.

Nowinski himself is a colorful character, with a personal stake in his research. Harvard-educated, Nowinski also wrestled for World Wrestling Entertainment. He’s an athlete who sustained two concussions while playing college football and four concussions as a pro wrestler, and he fears their permanent impact on his brain.

His brain bank now has the brains of 23 athletes. Why would a relative give up their loved one’s brain for Nowinski’s research? The decision was easy for Caroline Creekmur, the widow of NFL Hall of Famer Lou Creekmur. During his career his sustained 16 concussions, and after he retired he would break into rages and lose his memory.

Caroline tells Business Week/Bloomberg, “My husband died a hard death, and I did not know what was wrong. I wanted to know why this happened.”

This is really important stuff. It is from autopsy that we have learned the overwhelming majority of what we know about neuropathology. What is needed is to broaden this bank to include far more of those who have suffered concussions, particularly in accidents. While they never get the publicity that athlete’s concussions get, they affect far more people, far more profoundly. Through the study of the 40 year old accident victims brain, that we might unravel the deep mystery of why some people have such devastating results from TBI.


Attorney Gordon Johnson
Chair Traumatic Brain Injury Litigation Group, American Association of Justice
g@gordonjohnson.com :: 800-992-9447 :: Attorney Gordon S. Johnson, Jr.

http://subtlebraininjury.com :: http://brainanatomyguide.com :: http://car-accident-rain.com :: http://tbilaw.com
http://waiting.com :: http://vestibulardisorder.com :: http://youtube.com/profile?user=braininjuryattorney

N.J. Introduces New Regulations To Protect All Student Athletes From Concussions

0 comments

Posted on 9th March 2010 by gjohnson in Uncategorized

, , ,

The New Jersey entity that regulates high school athletics in state Monday introduced a set of rules that mandate that athletes who sustain head injuries must undergo a series of tests before being able to return to the field to play.

The story got significant play in the state’s primary newspaper, The Star-Ledger of Newark, which ran it on Page One. http://blog.nj.com/hssportsextra/2010/03/njsiaa_sets_guidelines_for_dea.html

If the New Jersey State Interscholastic Athletic Association (NJSIAA) approves the new measures, there would be a standard set of regulations to treat concussions for athletes in every single sport, according to The Ledger.

One of the new regulations is that players who sustain a concussion or head injury must show no symptoms or problems for a week before they can play again.

They must also do a six-step regimen where they gradually do aerobic exercise and get the OK of a medical professional to play again.

Trainers, student athletes and coaches will receive annual training on concussions, including their symptoms.

Those are some, but not all, of the requirements under the new NJSIAA guidelines. That body oversees athletic programs at 434 high schools in the Garden State.


Attorney Gordon Johnson
Chair Traumatic Brain Injury Litigation Group, American Association of Justice
g@gordonjohnson.com :: 800-992-9447 :: Attorney Gordon S. Johnson, Jr.

http://subtlebraininjury.com :: http://brainanatomyguide.com :: http://car-accident-rain.com :: http://tbilaw.com
http://waiting.com :: http://vestibulardisorder.com :: http://youtube.com/profile?user=braininjuryattorney

Report on New Jersey Hands Free Law – Two Years Post

0 comments

Posted on 6th March 2010 by gjohnson in Uncategorized

, , , , ,

New Jersey’s ban on motorists using hand-held cellphones is almost two years old, and so far there have been 3,610 crashed that involving cell phones, which led to 1,548 injuries and 13 deaths.

http://www.newjerseynewsroom.com/state/nj-ignores-law-banning-cell-phone-use-while-driving

During the same time span since 2008, there were 3,129 accident in which a driver was using a hands-free device, with 1,495 injuries and six deaths.

Those were some of the statistics supplied this week by the N.J. Division of Highway Traffic Safety.

Since the law prohibiting Garden State drivers from using hand-held cellphones went into effect 23 months ago, police have issued 224,725 citations for its violation. That constitutes just 4 percent of almost 5.4 million overall moving violations, not including DUI offenses, that took place in the same period.

http://www.nj.com/news/index.ssf/2010/03/nj_police_issued_225k_citation.html

New Jersey’s ban on cell phones went into effect March 1, 2008. But some might question its impact after seeing the results of a poll conducted last year by Fairleigh Dickinson University and the state highway traffic division. That survey found that the number of drivers who claim they have sent text messages while they were driving rose 40 percent between 2008 and 2009, according to NewJerseyNewsroom.com.

But talking on cellphones while driving has dropped, with 80 percent maintaining that in 2009 they never or rarely did it, an increase from 71 percent in 2007.

The penalty for violating New Jersey’s cellphone law is a $100 fine, along with court costs and fees.

New Jersey will be putting up signs, especially on highways that enter the state, warning drivers that it’s illegal to use a hand-held cellphone while you’re driving in thr Garden State.

Earlier this week, on Thursday, there was a bill before the New Jersey Assembly that would make police officers to note whether a driver was distracted before having an accident.

http://www.nj.com/news/index.ssf/2010/03/nj_may_ask_police_to_link_cras.html

When doing an accident report, police would have to check off a box that would say what the distraction was. The choices include using a cellphone, hair grooming, changing the radio, eating, using a FAX machine interacting with a pet.


Attorney Gordon Johnson
Chair Traumatic Brain Injury Litigation Group, American Association of Justice
g@gordonjohnson.com :: 800-992-9447 :: Attorney Gordon S. Johnson, Jr.

http://subtlebraininjury.com :: http://brainanatomyguide.com :: http://car-accident-rain.com :: http://tbilaw.com
http://waiting.com :: http://vestibulardisorder.com :: http://youtube.com/profile?user=braininjuryattorney

Pittsburgh Man Dies After Desperate 911 Calls Fail To Bring Help

1 comment

Posted on 1st March 2010 by gjohnson in Uncategorized

, , , , ,

Snow or no snow, there is no excuse for this tragic negligence. What if you dialed 911 repeatedly for help for your sick boyfriend, and nobody came? That’s what happened to Sharon Edge in Pittsburgh, and now her loved one is dead.
http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/sns-ap-us-snow-911-death,0,7798733.story

In a story very well reported by the Associated Press, 50-year-old Curtis Mitchell, a former steel worker, died despite the desperate efforts of Edge to save him. During a big Feb. 6 snowstorm, Mitchell got bad stomach pains, and Edge called 911 for help.

During her first call, Edge was told that help was coming. After 10 callbacks to 911, and 30 hours later, Mitchell died in his cold apartment, where the storm had knocked out the power.

Mitchell had previously suffered from pancreatitis, or inflammation of the pancreas, and had been hospitalized for treatment in January.

In Pittsburgh, officials are investigating what went wrong in Mitchell’s case. They are also looking to make changes to emergency services so this kind of fatality never happens again.

The storm had left two feet of snow in Pittsburgh. But two times, ambulances were within walking distance of Mitchell’s home, a quarter of a mile away, but they couldn’t drive their vehicle over a bridge to reach him. The notion of getting out of the ambulance to fetching their patient didn’t seem to occur to them.

AP quotes Pittsburgh’s public safety director as saying they failed Mitchell. There’s an understatement for you. The problem on pushing a program like 911 calls like we have, is that when it fails, there really is no backup. This is a life or death program and there is just no room for human or computer error. It must work, each and every time.


Attorney Gordon Johnson
Chair Traumatic Brain Injury Litigation Group, American Association of Justice
g@gordonjohnson.com :: 800-992-9447 :: Attorney Gordon S. Johnson, Jr.

http://subtlebraininjury.com :: http://brainanatomyguide.com :: http://car-accident-rain.com :: http://tbilaw.com
http://waiting.com :: http://vestibulardisorder.com :: http://youtube.com/profile?user=braininjuryattorney

The Bible of Mental Disorders – DSM-IV – May Undergo Controversial Revisions

0 comments

Posted on 11th February 2010 by gjohnson in Uncategorized

, , , , ,

The bible for diagnosing and treating mental illness, what The New York Times calls “the guidebook that largely determines where society draws the line between normal and not normal,” http://www.nytimes.com/2010/02/10/health/10psych.html?em
is undergoing some revisions that could have affect litigation and lawsuits.

The updating of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders has been the subject of much lobbying by various advocacy groups. The proposed changes to the book, which physicians rely on to categorize their patients’ illness, were released Tuesday. http://www.dsm5.org/Pages/Default.aspx

Both The Times and AOL News noted that any changes in the this manual of mental ailments have “huge implications” — not just for psychiatrists but for the legal system, government programs and pharmaceutical companies – in terms of who is considered normal or who is considered disabled.
http://www.aolnews.com/nation/article/big-changes-proposed-for-diagnostic-and-statistical-manual-of-mental-disorders/19352107?icid=main|main|dl1|link3|http%3A%2F%2Fwww.aolnews.com%2Fnation%2Farticle%2Fbig-changes-proposed-for-diagnostic-and-statistical-manual-of-mental-disorders%2F19352107

One of the revisions that has some experts worried is a new “at risk” category for those who show early signs of illnesses like dementia. The fear is that this new label will stigmatize patients.

Another recommendation is the creation of a new childhood disorder, temper dysregulation disorder with dysphoria. It’s a new category for aggressive children who previously might have been misdiagnosed as having bipolar disorder, and then were given antipsychotic drugs that have serious side effects.

New proposed categories for the DSM include one for sex addiction, “hypersexuality,” defined as when “a great deal of time is consumed by sexual fantasies and urges; and in planning for and engaging in sexual behavior.”

And binge eating is a new suggested disorder, defined as at least one binge a week for three months, followed by guilt and mood swings.

Interesting that the news doesn’t focus on the bogus definition of Post Concussion Disorder in the Appendix’s of the DSM-IV. Through two revisions, the drafters of this “bible” have been unable to agree on what defines a concussion. The proposed definition still contains a requirement of a 5 minute loss of consciousness, a requirement that has uniformly been rejected by the American Academy of Neurologists, the CDC, the United States Armed Services and virtually every peer reviewed research article this century.


Attorney Gordon Johnson
Chair Traumatic Brain Injury Litigation Group, American Association of Justice
g@gordonjohnson.com :: 800-992-9447 :: Attorney Gordon S. Johnson, Jr.

http://subtlebraininjury.com :: http://brainanatomyguide.com :: http://car-accident-rain.com :: http://tbilaw.com
http://waiting.com :: http://vestibulardisorder.com :: http://youtube.com/profile?user=braininjuryattorney

Wall Street Journal Offers Its Take, Which Is Our Take, On Why Cellphone Bans Don’t Decrease Accidents

0 comments

Posted on 4th February 2010 by gjohnson in Uncategorized

, , , , ,

The Wall Street Journal Wednesday did an entire story elaborating on a topic we touched on earlier this week: That it shouldn’t be a surprise that bans on hand-held cellphone use and texting while driving apparently don’t reduce the number of accidents.
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704022804575041552234321736.html?mod=WSJ_LifeStyle_Lifestyle_5

The Journal story was a follow-up on a study released last week by the Highway Loss Data Institute (HDLI) and the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS). The study didn’t find any significant drop in accident claims in states that have barred the use of cellphones while driving.

That HLDI survey flies in the face of other research and what common sense would dictate: That without the distraction of using a handheld cellphone, there should be less crashes. But that wasn’t necessarily so. The Journal reported that New York banned the use of hand-held cellphones in November 2001, and driver cellphone use decreased 47 percent. And while there was a drop in monthly collision claims in the Empire State, that trend had begun before the ban was passed, according to The Journal.

An HLDI official, Kim Hazelbaker, told the newspaper that the institute was surprised at the results of its own research. The Journal cited a number of possible reasons why the number of crashes didn’t decrease after the cellphone and texting bans.

The bans are not being enforced, some said. And then the story cited the reason we previously pointed out, namely that talking on any type of phone while driving can be a deadly distraction.

A spokesman for the Governors Highway Safety Association claimed that in light of the HLDI study, it recommends that states enact bans on motorists texting but wait before barring cellphone use.

The IIHS said it’s long argued there hasn’t been a huge spike in car accidents, despite the proliferation of cellphones.

The U.S. Department of Transportation, according to The Journal, will be launching two pilot programs in New York and Connecticut to see what happens when authorities enforce cellphone bans as strictly as they do drunk-driving and seat-belt laws.


Attorney Gordon Johnson
Chair Traumatic Brain Injury Litigation Group, American Association of Justice
g@gordonjohnson.com :: 800-992-9447 :: Attorney Gordon S. Johnson, Jr.

http://subtlebraininjury.com :: http://brainanatomyguide.com :: http://car-accident-rain.com :: http://tbilaw.com
http://waiting.com :: http://vestibulardisorder.com :: http://youtube.com/profile?user=braininjuryattorney