Singer Glen Campbell Diagnosed With Alzheimer’s Disease

0 comments

Posted on 26th June 2011 by gjohnson in Uncategorized

The famous, talented and rich are not spared being stricken by Alzheimer’s disease. And the latest celebrity to be diagnosed  with the malady is country singer Glen Campbell, who is 75.  

Last week, in an article in People magazine, Campbell’s wife Kim said that Campbell has a new album “dropping,” as they say in the music industry, in August. And that will apparently be his last album, because of  the Alzheimer’s.

http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/music_blog/2011/06/glen-campbell-alzheimers-ghost-canvas.html

Campbell will go on “The Glen Campbell Goodbye Tour” this fall to promote “Ghost on the Canvas,” which includes performances by Chris Isaak and Brian Setzer. 

It’s sad that Campbell’s career as a singer, songwriter and sometime actor will be cut short. His performance of “Wichita Lineman” is one of the most hauntingly beautiful songs ever, conveying the loneliness of that man – and seemingly of Campbell himself.

Written by Jimmy Webb, and released in tumultuous 1968, several music magazines have called “Wichita Lineman’ of of the best songs of the 20th Century, because of its lines such as “and I need you more than want you, and I want you for all-time.”

Campbell’s career and life has had many ups and downs. He was arrested in Arizona in 2004 for driving while intoxicated, and spent 10 days in jail.

His wife announced that Campbell has Alzheimer’s disease to relieve him of any additional humiliation. She told People that if he forgets a song or gets confused when he’s performing, she didn’t want the audience to think he was drunk.

Campbell unfortunately has Alzheimer’s, but his wife has got his back.

Scientists Link Cellphones To Brain Cancer Again

0 comments

Posted on 2nd June 2011 by gjohnson in Uncategorized

, ,

The debate over whether cellphones cause brain cancer was reignited this week.

That’s because a group of global experts, a panel of the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), Tuesday said that cellphone use may heighten the risk for brain cancer. IARC is part of the World Health Organization, and its panel reviewed past studies to come to its own conclusion.

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052702303657404576357571174992448.html?KEYWORDS=cellphone+cancer+warning

The panel announced that cellphones may increase the risk for glioma, a form of brain cancer, and acoustic neuroma, a non-malignant brain tumor. 

http://www.iarc.fr/en/media-centre/pr/2011/pdfs/pr208_E.pdf

In IRAC’s press release,  Dr. Jonathan Samet , who is with the University of Southern California and is overall chairman of the panel,  stated that “the evidence, while still accumulating, is strong enough to support a conclusion and the 2B classification. The conclusion means that there could be some risk, and therefore we need to keep a close watch for a link between cell phones and cancer risk.”

The 2B classification includes chloroform, coffee and gasoline exhaust, and here is the complete explanation of that classification.

Group 2B: The agent is possibly carcinogenic to humans

 ”This category is used for agents for which there is limited evidence of carcinogenicity in humans and less than sufficient evidence of carcinogenicity in experimental animals. It may also be used when there is inadequate evidence of carcinogenicity in humans but there is sufficient evidence of carcinogenicity in experimental animals.

In some instances, an agent for which there is inadequate evidence of carcinogenicity in humans and less than sufficient evidence of carcinogenicity in experimental animals together with supporting evidence from mechanistic and other relevant data may be placed in this group. An agent may be classified in this category solely on the basis of strong evidence from mechanistic and other relevant data.”

IRAC’s press release sparked a quick response from the telecom industry, the maker of cellphones, which said that evidence of their causing brain cancer remains inconclusive.

Even the IRAC said that more research is needed. 

“Given the potential consequences for public health of this classification and findings, it is important that additional research be conducted into the long‐term, heavy use of mobile phones,” IARC director Christopher Wild said in a statement. “Pending the availability of such information, it is important to take pragmatic measures to reduce exposure such as hands‐free devices or texting.”