Teen’s Basketball Concussion Turns Her Into A Southpaw

0 comments

Posted on 26th February 2011 by gjohnson in Uncategorized

, ,

Here’s another truth-is-stranger-than-fiction story about brain injury. 

A teenager in Washington state sustained a concussion during a basketball game, and wound up getting amnesia and becoming left-handed. http://abcnews.go.com/print?id=12982365

The case involves Mikayla Wilson, 14, of Spangle, Wash. She was knocked to the ground during a basketball game, but didn’t become unconscious or seem to suffer any head injury. Wilson played several more quarters, and then looked around at her teammates and asked her mother why the girls were dressed like her and looking at her, according to ABCnews.com.

A local hospital did a CT scan on Wilson and didn’t detect any bleeding or skull fractures, Doctors diagnosed the teen’s amnesia as a symptom of a concussion. 

Nearly a  month after her injury, Wilson is still having problems with her memory. She can’t remember friends’ names and couldn’t remember how to play the flute and saxophone.

But perhaps strangest of all, Wilson suddenly started writing with her left hand. She had been ambidextrous as a child.

But there is a bright spot to this story: Wilson’s memory about some things is beginning to return. 

Cellphones Spark Activity In The Brain, New Study Finds

0 comments

Posted on 23rd February 2011 by gjohnson in Uncategorized

,

Since most people have cellphones these days, it’s no wonder that the press gave a lot of space to a new study on the impact of these devices on the brain. How many of us have wondered, uneasily, can our cellphone hurt our minds?

The recent hoopla on the topic started earlier this week when  the Journal of the American Medical Association  published the study. Researchers found that “spending 50 minutes with a cellphone plastered to your ear,” as Reuters put it, increases activity in the part of the brain near the phone’s antenna.

http://jama.ama-assn.org/content/305/8/808.short

The researchers who conducted the study warned that at this point it is too early to draw any conclusions about the implications of the brain-activity change, or whether it it good or bad.

But all the press accounts agreed that the study is likely to stir up once again the ongoing debate about the safety of cellphones and the impact of their electromagnetic radiation on the brain.

The study, done by the National Institutes of Health, used positron emission tomography, or PET scans, to gauge changes in the brains of 47 test subjects. 

Cellphones were held on the right and left sides of the heads of the test subjects for 50 minutes on two different days.  The cellphones were just turned on the second day. Researchers found that when the cellphone was live there was an increase in activity in the part of the brain near the cellphone’s antenna, not where the phone actually came in contact with the head,

That led researchers to believe that the activity was sparked by the electromagnetic signals of the cellphones, not the heat coming from them, according to The Los Angeles Times.      

http://www.latimes.com/health/la-he-cell-phones-brain-20110223,0,4544944.story?track=rss

The test subjects did not speak into the cellphone, or hear anyone speak on it, during the test.

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704071304576160652541652440.html?mod=WSJ_hp_MIDDLENexttoWhatsNewsThird

According to The Los Angeles Times, the Food and Drug Administration “has taken the position that any harmful effects of cellphones are the result of tissue becoming overheated by direct exposure to the device as it warms with prolonged use.”

That is not what this new study found.

The New York Times noted that the increased brain activity, which was indicated by an increase in brain glucose metabolism, ”could potentially lead to the creation of molecules called free radicals, which in excess can damage healthy cells.” 

It seems too early for such speculation, but the new study does raise a red flag and indicates that follow-up research must be done. 

http://www.nytimes.com/2011/02/23/sports/football/23duerson.html?_r=1&ref=todayspaper

TV Reporter Who Made Incoherent Comments At Grammys Belonged In Hospital

0 comments

Posted on 19th February 2011 by gjohnson in Uncategorized

, , , , , ,

By now a lot of people have seen the video clip, which quickly went viral, of KCBS-TV reporter Serene Branson breaking out in gibberish when she was covering the Grammy Awards live. It was disturbing to watch. 

http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5iCs7G8IBFrVxUKo0VnTxbSDmfqRg?docId=1a3b45a9713c4d079f8621e00393d1ca

The immediate assumption was that Branson had suffered a stroke, and that was the explanation for her incoherent speech. But since then we’ve all learned, after the TV reporter underent a brain scan, that she had been stricken by a migraine headache. 

The exact diagnosis was migraine aura, a condition whose symptoms are similar to stroke.

During an appearance on CBS’s “The Early Show,”  Brannon said she hadn’t been feeling well the day of the Grammys, that she had a hadache and her vision was blurry.

She was terrified by what happened during her live report. Her concerned camera crew rushed up to her, she said on “The Early Show.” In her mind she had known exactly what words she wanted to say, but could not utter them.

An ambulance was called to the scene, and the EMT’s asked Branson. they asked if she wanted to go to the hospital. That really should have not been a choice. The TV reporter said on “The Early Show” that she was dressed in an evening gown, it was late and she was exhausted.

“I said I just wanted to go home,” Janson said.

But what if in fact she had suffered a stroke, or some unusual brain malady that warranted immediate  medical care? Instead of being in a hospital where doctors could test and observe her, she was at home following her migraine attack.

When it appears someone is having neurological problems, their judgment about whether they need to go to the hospital or not should not be trusted. They should be taken, pronto.  

 

Nascar Still Takes Road To More Aggression In The Name Of Excitement

0 comments

Posted on 14th February 2011 by gjohnson in Uncategorized

,

Nascar is once again ramping up its efforts to make the sport more exciting to fans, even if it’s more dangerous to drivers.

The Wall Street Journal Monday, in a story headlined “Nascar Revs Up Rough Side to Win Back Fans,” described how Nascar created a 12,000-panel of stock-car fans for guidance on how to make the sport more exciting. Nascar was trying to stem a loss of fans, TV viewership and sponsorships during the past few years.

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703515504576142370223545128.html?KEYWORDS=NASCAR

To inject more pizzazz in the sport, Nascar is allowing racers to be more aggressive, overlooking “minor incidents of shoving, swearing and even rubbing bumpers — acts that once might have meant penalties,” according to The Journal.

To cater to fans, Dayton International Speedway is now allowing patrons to bring up to 36 cans of beer in with them, not just a six-pack, The Journal reported.

Nascar kicks off Feb. 20 with the Daytona 500, and I hope the changes won’t lead to more accidents and injuries, just in the name of more “excitement.”