New Mothers Show Brain Growth After Giving Birth

1 comment

Posted on 31st October 2010 by gjohnson in Uncategorized

,

 Childbirth apparently leads to bigger brains for new moms, according to a recent study.  

 http://www.aolhealth.com/2010/10/22/woman-grow-bigger-brains-months-after-giving-birth/?icid=main%7Cmain%7Cdl3%7Csec3_lnk1%7C179843&a_dgi=aolshare_email

The research, spearheaded by Dr. Pilyoung Kim with the National Institute of Mental Health, found that becoming a mother may not be so much “an instinctive response as a process requiring brain building,” according to AOL Health.

The study also discovered that mothers who have the best, most positive reactions with their babies also showed the most growth in the parts of the brain dealing with “emotional processing, sensory integration, reasoning and judgment,” AOL Health said.

Why would this be? Professor Dr. Crain Kinsley theorized that these brain changes in new mothers are an evolutionary adaptation, one meant to ensure the survival of newborns.

New mothers are responsible for a newborn’s survival, and the growth of the moms’ brains makes them better caregivers.

And here’s an interesting twist: The brain changes only take place in “good” mothers. 

The study is inconclusive, since it only involved 19 women. More work needs to be done with a larger sample of new moms.            

 

Hypocrite U.S. Chamber of Commerce Says It Can Sue, Not You

0 comments

Posted on 27th October 2010 by gjohnson in Uncategorized

, , , ,

Hypocrisy, thy name is the U.S. Chamber of Commerce and its president and CEO, Tom Donohue. 

Today, Wednesday, the chamber is holding its annual Legal Reform Summit, whose unstated agenda is to undermine the civil justice system and to weaken the basic legal protections of American workers and consumers.

The chamber has developed a double standard as far as litigation is concerned: Filing lawsuits is OK as long as the chamber is the one doing it. Earlier this month Donohue called litigation “one of our most powerful tools for making sure that federal agencies follow the law and are held accountable.”

As it turns out, the chamber is one of the most aggressive litigators in Washington, entering lawsuits at a rate of over twice weekly. That kind of suing passes the chamber’s muster.

But that’s apparently not the case when litigation is filed to protect consumers and workers, according to a new report by the American Association for Justice (AAJ), which is made up of trial lawyers.

“The Chamber’s ‘one rule for corporations, another rule for everybody else’ motto has come at the expense of ill-treated workers, defrauded investors and injured consumers,” AAJ president Gibson Vance said in a press release Wednesday. “It readily spends millions of dollars to prevent Americans from holding wrongdoers accountable in the courtroom, and then aggressively uses the very same legal system to advance the agenda of its multinational corporate membership.”

http://www.justice.org/cps/rde/xchg/justice/hs.xsl/13570.htm

Here’s the chamber’s litigation  list of shame, according to the AAJ. The chamber has:

  • justified the actions of Wall Street banks that drove the country’s economy into turmoil;
  • defended the worst CEOs and their most extravagant excesses;
  • tried to force workers, instead of employers, to pay for their own safety equipment;
  • filed numerous actions opposing any move to combat climate change;
  • sought to shield pharmaceutical executives who skirted safety procedures that ultimately killed 11 children;
  • opposed measures allowing workers to receive a rest period during a full work day;
  • fought on behalf of lead paint manufacturers found to have poisoned thousands of children;
  • defended corporations that discriminated on the basis of race and disability;
  • and spent years defending big tobacco, asbestos companies and chemical companies found to have contaminated water and air.

“The Chamber has every right to seek what it believes to be justice in a court of law, even if representing the most deplorable corporate interests,” Vance said. “But it must learn that this right to justice belongs not just to their organization, or big business generally, but to all Americans.”

The report, titled “The Chamber Litigation Machine: How the Chamber Uses Lawsuits to Keep Americans out of Court,” can be found at www.justice.org/USChamber. There, you can read about the chamber’s past actions in gory detail.

Here are portions of it that caught my eye.

“On one hand, the Chamber spends an unrivaled amount of money lobbying to restrict access to the courts for ordinary Americans,” the report says. “On the other, it files copious lawsuits and briefs in defense of the likes of AIG, Wal-Mart, Firestone and a slew of pharmaceutical and insurance companies.”

According to the report, ”The Chamber has spent hundreds of millions of dollars financing efforts to close the courthouse doors to American consumers through massive lobbying campaigns, advertising and bankrolling anti-consumer political candidates. It has its own multimillion dollar affiliate, the Institute for Legal Reform (ILR), whose sole mission is to restrict the ability of individuals harmed by negligent corporations to file suit.”

I’ll end with this factoid from the report.

“Yet ironically, the Chamber is also one of the most aggressive litigators in Washington, D.C., appearing in hundreds of lawsuits a year. The Chamber has its own litigation arm, the National Chamber Litigation Center (NCLC), which both fi les its own lawsuits and enters into the lawsuits of others more than 130 times a year.”

I guess the chamber’s motto is “Do as I say, not as I do.”

 

Brain-Damaged Arizona Bicyclist Gets $3.5 Million Settlement For Tucson Tour Accident

1 comment

Posted on 21st October 2010 by gjohnson in Uncategorized

, , ,

An Arizona bicyclist who sustained severe brain injury while competing in a race in Tucson has reached a $3.5 million settlement with Pima County and the organizers of El Tour de Tucson, The Arizona Star reported Tuesday. 

http://azstarnet.com/news/local/crime/article_8aecede2-77e1-5827-8ed6-aa2c23f677b7.html

The settlement goes to Gary Stuebe, who was riding in the tour Nov. 22, 2008 when 91-year-old William Wilson made a turn and hit 10 bicyclists.  Stuebe, 41 at the time of the accident, sustained life-threatening brain injury and four other riders were hurt.

Stuebe’s wife and the four injured bikers filed suit against Wilson, the race’s organizers, Sheriff Clarence Dupnik and Deputy Muriel McGillicuddy, who did traffic control at the race.  All the plaintiffs have settled with Wilson for an undisclosed amount, and all but one have now settled with the county.

One remaining suit, filed by San Diego attorney Don English, is scheduled to go to trial Nov. 2.

In the accident Steube damaged his frontal and temporal lobes, had to have parts of his brain removed and was in a coma for 40 days. He now also has epilepsy.

Stuebe had been a senior inventory analyst for PetSmart, but because of his brain injuries he can’t return to that position. 

 

 

New Jersey Girl’s ‘Inoperable’ Brain Tumor Removed With Laser Treatment

12 comments

Posted on 18th October 2010 by gjohnson in Uncategorized

, ,

A 10-year-old girl from Howell, N.J., may owe her life to an experimental laser procedure that “burned” a tumor from deep within the child’s brain.  

 http://www.nj.com/news/index.ssf/2010/10/howell_girl_is_first_child_in.html

The Star-Ledger of Newark wrote a story, headlined “Tackling the ‘Inoperable,’” Friday about Madison Beggs, who is undergoing post-surgical daily radiation treatment and chemotherapy at the UMDNJ-Robert Wood Johnson’s brain tumor center. 

During the summer Madison was diagnosed with a brain tumor that was so deep in her cranium that regular surgery couldn’t be used to remove it. Instead, she underwent  a laser procedure that could safety attack the tumor in the center of her brain stem.

A small hole was made in Madison’s skull, and a fiber-optic wire was moved through her brain, safely bypassing blood vessels, to get to the tumor.

A month after the procedure, the tumor is still gone with no signs of any regrowth yet.

Less than 100 adults in the United States have been treated with the laser ablation surgery, and Madison is the first child to have it, according to The Ledger.

Six hospitals are using the experimental laser treatment on brain tumors.

Let’s see if this technology, already approved by the Food and Drug Adminstration, does indeed turn inoperable, fatal brain tumors into operable ones.

 

Study Finds That Neurotic People Cost Us $22,000 A Year

1 comment

Posted on 9th October 2010 by gjohnson in Uncategorized

,

Neurotic people are a financial burden to society, according to Dutch research, costing society as much as $22,000 a year.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/us_neurotic_costs/print

 The least neurotic people only cost society about $3,000 a year, but the most neurotic ring up costs of more than $22,000, says a study by VU University Medical Center in Amsterdam, according to Reuters.

That research studied at about 5,500 people and looked at their medical bills as well as they days they were out of work . Researchers used a scale of 14 items to gauge a person’s level of neuroticism, which is which is defined as a tendency toward anxiety, worry and emotional swings.

The study determined that while common mental disorders generate costs of $600 million per million inhabitants, that number was $1.4 billion for those with neuroticism.     

First Judge Finds That Federal Health Care Reform Is Constitutional

1 comment

Posted on 9th October 2010 by gjohnson in Uncategorized

, ,

Foes of President Obama’s health care reform have lost the first round to have the law ruled unconstitutional, according to The New York Times.

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/10/08/health/policy/08health.html?_r=1&scp=1&sq=George%20E.%20Steeh&st=cse

Judge George Steeh of Federal District Court in Detroit Thursday threw out one of the 15 lawsuits that have been filed in opposition to health care reform. The judge found that the federal health law is constitutional, ruling that choosing not to have health insurance is one of the “activities that sustantially affect interstate commerce.”

There are similar legal challenges pending in states such as Florida and Virginia.

As The Times explained it, the question that Steeh dealt with, and which may ultimately may wind up before the U.S. Supreme Court, is whether the Commerce Clause of the Constitution allows  Congress to mandate that Americans buy a commercial product, in this case health insurance. 

Hypertonic Fluids Don’t Help Brain Injury Victims, Study Finds

1 comment

Posted on 6th October 2010 by gjohnson in Uncategorized

, , , , , ,

 Here’s another setback in the emergency treatment of brain injury.

A study has found that hypertonic fluid, a concentrated saline solution that paramedics administer intravenously to  head trauma patients, doesn’t help improve the patients’ chances of survival or their later brain function, according to a story in The Wall Street Journal Wednesday.

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703298504575534362216876780.html?mod=ITP_pageone_1

 The story, headlined “Saline Fluid Fails in Brain Therapy,” reports that a study released this week found that hypertonic fluid is not effective in the treatment of blunt traumatic brain injuries. That makes the saline solution the latest treatment, following anti-oxidants and intravenous magnesium, to flunk tests gauging their ability to help brain-trauma victims.

It has been believed that hypertonic fluid improves the blood flow in the brain while also decreasing intercranial pressure, and both those effects aid brain injury victims.  

The hypertonic fluid study, published in this week’s Journal of the American Medical Association ( JAMA), involved 1,282 patients treated by paramedics. The patients were either given regular saline solution or the hypertonic variety, which has eight times as much salt as the regular saline, according to The Journal.      

http://jama.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/abstract/304/13/1455

 The study’s authors, who included University of Washington surgery professor Eileen Bulger, said they couldn’t see any improvement in the six-month neurological outcome of the patients who received the hypertonic solution, according to The Journal. 

The study’s authors also wrote that there was “no compelling reason” to use “hypertonic fluid resuscitation for TBI in the out-of-hospital setting.”

The Journal Wednesday also noted that the U.S. Department of Defense has awarded $26.3 million to Banyan Biomarkers Inc. of Alachua, Fla. The military wants Banyan to devise a blood test to determine “the presence and severity of brain injury,” the newspaper reported. Biomarkers are proteins that an injured brain produces.

In the combat arena, the biomarker test would let the military immediately identify who has suffered brain injury in a bomb blast, and get them off the battlefield for treatment.      

  

Neurofeedback The Subject Of Major Study Being Released Oct. 26

0 comments

Posted on 5th October 2010 by gjohnson in Uncategorized

, , , ,

Controversial neurofeedback, which purportedly helps people change their own brain waves, is seeing a surge in popularity, according to The New York Times.

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/10/05/health/05neurofeedback.html?_r=1&hpw

Proponents of neurofeedback, which entails having electrodes attached to your scalp, say that it can help people deal with problems such as depression, anxiety and attention deficient hyperactivity disorder, The Times wrote Tuesday, describing it as “biofeedback for the brain.”

And although the traditional medical community has been wary of neurofeedback, the practice has been drawing the attention of research groups such as the National Institute of Mental Health. In fact, the institute will be releasing the results of its study of neurofeedback being used to treat ADHD on Oct. 26, at the annual meeting of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry.     

Neurofeedback’s roots go back to the 1960s and 1970s, and in effect it got a bad name when some researchers made fantastic claims about its benefits. And it still has vocal critics, such as William Pelham Jr., director of the Center for Children and Families, who called it “crackpot charlatanism,” according to The Times.

But then the story offers a case study where neurofeedback apparently worked. A 7-year-old diagnosed with pervasive development disorder, with autisism-like symptoms, underwent neurofeedback treatments and made tremendous strides. 

Neurofeedback has one huge plus: It’s a treatment for brain disorders that doesn’t involve drugs. 

 

Fort Hood Takes Extra Measures To Halt Soldier Suicides

0 comments

Posted on 1st October 2010 by gjohnson in Uncategorized

,

Fort Hood in Texas has a suicide-prevention program, but the number of soldiers taking own lives there continues to rise at a record rate, with four killing themselves this week.

 http://www.nytimes.com/2010/09/30/us/30hood.html

 In response to the latest round of deaths, the Army is having superior officers make extra visits to thousands of soliders at Foot Hood, which has had 14 suicides so far this year, including the most recent four deaths.

 http://www.wlbt.com/story/13244089/fort-hood-assessing-soldiers-in-wake-of-suicides

Fort Hood is the largest  U.S. base, according to The New York Times, and it has been plagued by mental illness, suicide and domesic violence as groups of soldiers return from overseas combat duty — which often entails multiple tours and brain injury from bomb blasts.

Last Sunday 31-year-old Sgt. Michael Franklin, who served two tours in Iraq, killed his wife on the base and then turned his gun on himself. And just shy of a year ago Army psychiatrist Major Nidal Hassan allegedly killed 13 people at the post.

The Associated Press reported Thusday that now that Fort Hood has hit 14 suicides for 2010, more than 32,000 solidiers from the rank of sergeant and below will get visits from their superiors in their barracks or in their homes to get a grasp on how they are doing.  

Fort Hood already has a Resiliency Campus, which was meant to help soliders and their families prepare for deployment. But that center is not aimed at preventing suicides. 

But now Fort Hood plans to offer training at how to spot troops that are having problems and may be contemplating suicide.     

The Problems Enforcing Washington’s Model Lystedt Concussion Law

1 comment

Posted on 1st October 2010 by gjohnson in Uncategorized

, , ,

Many states have enacted concussion laws to protect young athletes, but those rules are not always properly enforced by schools and doctors, according to an incisive article by The New York Times. 

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/09/23/sports/23concussion.html

 Headlined “Despite Law, Town Finds Concussion Dangers Lurk,” the story talks about Sequiem, a hamlet in Washtington, the state whose Lystedt concussion law is a model for such legislation across the country. The law is named after Zackery Lystedt, who suffered permanent brain damage in a high school game.

 The Times chronicles the problems that some parents — even in a state that has a landmark concussion law — face when they try to get schools and medical personnel to adhere to that law. 

In one instance described in the story, a youth who sustained a concussion playing high school football was told on his discharge papers, “May return to sports when able.” That’s not the protocol under the law.

In another case, a junior varsity football player with a concussion didn’t get any medical attention on the field, because medical emergency crews are only assigned to varsity games, according to The Times.

And when one Sequiem mother asked that the school system set up a baseline neuropsychological testing program, an aid in determining when an athlete can safely return to play, she hit a brick wall. She was told that because of liability and legal issues, the school district’s insurance company and the Washington Interscholastic Activities Association both recommended not doing the baseline testing, according to The Times. 

The story puts a spotlight on the fact that not just laws, but successful enforcement, is a crucial part of protecting youthful athletes from concussions.